USPTO serial 73692858
FRANCE TELECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRANCE TELECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON D. COPLEIN
GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY PC405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISIONS, VIDEO RECORDERS, TELECOPIERS, COMPUTERS, MICRO-COMPUTERS, MICRO-PROCESSORS, CODERS, MAGNETIC MEDIA IN THE FORM OF DISCS, DISKETTES AND CASSETTES AND PRE-RECORDED COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | TECHNICAL MANUALS, BOOKS, LEAFLETS AND BROCHURES FOR INSTRUCTION IN THE OPERATION AND/OR THE MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND TELEPHONE DIRECTORY, TELEVISION PROGRAMS, MAGAZINE RELATING TO ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND NEWSPAPER | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | DATA PROCESSING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION AND DATA VIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | RENTING, LEASING, SELLING AND OPERATING OF TELEPHONES, TELEFAXES, COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, COMMUNICATION SATELLITE CHANNELS; WRITING AND SELLING COMPUTER PROGRAMS RELATING TO THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY; WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF INFORMATION RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATION PRODUCTS AND THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MINISTERE DES P ET T
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRANCE TELECOM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |