Drawing for F.T.I.

USPTO serial 73692859

F.T.I.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with F.T.I.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GORDON D. COPLEIN

GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009RENTING, LEASING, SELLING AND OPERATING OF TELEPHONES, TELEFAXES, COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, COMMUNICATION SATELLITE CHANNELS; WRITING AND SELLING COMPUTER PROGRAMS RELATING TO THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY; WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF INFORMATON RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATION PRODUCTS AND THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRYABANDONED—
016TECHNICAL MANUALS, BOOKS, LEAFLETS AND BROCHURES FOR INSTRUCTION IN THE OPERATION AND/OR THE MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND TELEPHONE DIRECTORY, TELEVISION PROGRAMS, MAGAZINE RELATING TO ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND NEWSPAPERSABANDONED—
035DATA PROCESSING SERVICESABANDONED—
038TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION AND DATA VIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, RADIO AND TELEVISIOABANDONED—
042SERVICES IN PRODUCING AND MANAGING DATA CORRESPONDING TO INFORMATIONABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 9, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance