USPTO serial 73693442
TRILON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRILON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY A. MILLER
NANCY A MILLERSCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WSTE 4000 BOX 401TORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CORPORATE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES; BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY SERVICES; REAL ESTATE AGENCY AND INVESTMENT SERVICES; CAPITAL AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT SERVICES; INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY INDIVIDUAL LIFE, SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT, GROUP LIFE, PENSION AND HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, PERSONAL AND CASUALTY UNDERWRITING, AND INSURANCE BROKERAGE AND CONSULTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |