Drawing for WAVE TAMER

USPTO serial 73695411

WAVE TAMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVE TAMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN J. SWARTZ

JOHN J SWARTZ LEFEVRE, SWARTZ & WILSON908 COURT STSAGINAW, MI 48602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019CONTROLLING LAKESHORE EROSIONABANDONEDJun 7, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 1989PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 23, 1989PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance