Drawing for CRUMBLES MUFFINS

USPTO serial 73695975

CRUMBLES MUFFINS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANNON, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRUMBLES MUFFINS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GAIL L. MORRISSEY

GAIL L MORRISSEY BIEBEL, FRENCH & NAUMAN2500 KETTERING TWRDAYTON, OH 45423UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030MUFFINS, CAKES, ROLLS, COFFEE AND TEA FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISESABANDONEDNov 5, 1984
042RESTAURANT AND CARRY-OUT FOOD SERVICESABANDONEDNov 5, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 8, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance