USPTO serial 73696323
HOT SHOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOT SHOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN H. HARTMAN
STEVEN H HARTMAN MILGRIM THOMAJAN & LEE PCTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-0355Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | GIRLS' TOPS AND BOTTOMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1989 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |