USPTO serial 73696372
CLASSIC FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLASSIC FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | HAMBURGER PATTIES; PREPARED ENTREES FEATURING MEAT, POULTRY, SEAFOOD OR CHEESE WITH VEGETABLES, RICE, BREAD, PASTA OR POTATOES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |