Drawing for MELANGE BLANC

USPTO serial 73696512

MELANGE BLANC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MELANGE BLANC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

IWIN C. ALTER

IWIN C ALTER ALTER AND WEISS, LTD33 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WHITE WINESABANDONEDJun 5, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance