Drawing for QPSX

USPTO serial 73697429

QPSX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QPSX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. R. HULBERT

W R HULBERT FISH & RICHARDSON225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELEPHONE AND DATA SWITCHING NETWORKS, DATA ACCESS PROTOCOLS FOR DATA COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKS, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR DATA AND VOICE COMMUNICATIONSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 28, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance