USPTO serial 73697638
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ROTTERDAM, NL
WILLEMSTAD, CURACAO, AN
WILLEMSTAD, CURACAO, AN
75008 PARIS, FR
WILLEMSTAD, CURACAO, AN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIANE SETTON
STEPHEN L BAKER BAKER & RANNELLS PA626 N THOMPSON STRARITAN, NJ 08869UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME, COLOGNE AND EAU DE TOILET; ESSENTIAL OILS AND SOAPS CONTAINING PERFUME FOR BEAUTY PURPOSES; COSMETICS, NAMELY FRAGRANCE FACIAL BASE MAKE-UP, FACIAL POWDERS, COLORED LIPSTICKS, EYE SHADOWS AND ROUGE; PERFUMED HAIR CARE PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |