USPTO serial 73698682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BARCELONA, ES
BARCELONA, ES
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN R. STERN
MARVIN R STERN FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET AL400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FLOURS, BREAKFAST CEREALS, SPICES AND COMPOUND FLOURS, FLOUR SUBSTITUTES, YEAST, PASTRY, DOUGHNUTS, CAKES, SPONGE CAKES, CANDIES, COOKIES, CHOCOLATE, VINEGAR, HONEY, RICE, SALT, MUSTARD, TEA, SUGAR, TWISTED COFFEE CAKE, BISCUITS, BREAD, TOASTED BREAD, MARZIPAN, COFFEE, COCOA, EDIBLE ICE CREAMS, NOUGAT AND VANILLA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 11, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |