USPTO serial 73698857
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES H. THOMAS
CHARLES H THOMAS CISLO & THOMASSTE 4054201 LONG BEACH BLVDLONG BEACH, CA 90807| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION COMMERCIALS AND IN THE PRODUCTION OF OUTGOING ANNOUNCEMENTS USED ON 900 AND 976 PREFIXES FOR CALLER PAID TELEPHONE CALLS | ABANDONED | Jul 26, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |