USPTO serial 73698869
FLO-STOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 1989
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLO-STOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
PITTSBURG, PA
SAN DIEGO, CA
PITTSBURG, PA
PITTSBURG, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Dreitler
Joseph R. Dreitler Bricker & Eckler, LLP100 South Third StreetColumbus, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | DISPOSABLE INTEGRAL COMPONENTS OF A PUMP/CONTROLLER DEVICE WHICH PERMIT OPERATIONAL INFUSION OF MEDICAL SOLUTIONS TO PATIENTS AND OPERATE AS SAFETY MECHANISM TO PREVENT UNINTENTIONAL FREE FLOW OF MEDICAL SOLUTIONS TO PATIENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 3, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARDINAL HEALTH 303, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IMED CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CAREFUSION 303, INC
- Other trademarks owned by FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named FLO-STOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |