Drawing for INTEGRATED NETWORKS

USPTO serial 73698884

INTEGRATED NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRATED NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEIL K. NYDEGGER, ESQ.

NEIL K NYDEGGER ESQ NYDEGGER & HARSHMANREGENTS SQ I STE 7504275 EXECUTIVE SQLA JOLLA, CA 92037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE COMPONENTS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMSABANDONEDAug 26, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 1991OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 29, 1991OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 8, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 16, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1989OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 13, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 1, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance