USPTO serial 73698961
PULSAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PULSAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. ALAN UEBLER
E ALAN UEBLER MORTENSON & UEBLER, PALINDELL SQ STE 41601 MILLTOWN RDWILMINGTON, DE 19808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES - NAMELY, PROVIDING LEASING OF, ADP EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING PC'S, MINI SYSTEMS AND MAINFRAMES), HIGH-TECH ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, FIXES AND ROTARY AIRCRAFT, MEDICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT, TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, COPYING, DUPLICATING EQUIPMENT AND FACSIMILE MACHINES, FURNITURE (OFFICE/DORMITORY), REAL ESTATE FINANCING, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FINANCING AND VENTURE CAPITAL FINANCING | ABANDONED | Oct 5, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |