USPTO serial 73699105
MULTIWEBB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIWEBB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ILOMANTSI, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | FABRICS FOR USE IN MAKING CLOTHING, INCONTINENCE PRODUCTS, SPECIAL MEDICAL ARTICLES, AND OTHER RELATED MEDICAL USES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |