Drawing for MASTERPIECE PIES

USPTO serial 73699445

MASTERPIECE PIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DATRI, ALAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERPIECE PIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILLIP. H. SMITH

PHILLIP H SMITH MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030WHOLE BAKED PIES DISTRIBUTED ONLY IN BAKERIESABANDONEDSep 28, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 5, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 13, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 12, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 19, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance