USPTO serial 73699446
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANT MERCHANTS, LTD.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANT MERCHANTS, LTD.
PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANT MERCHANTS, LTD.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANT MERCHANTS, LTD.
SEATTLE, WA
PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANT MERCHANTS, LTD.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANT MERCHANTS, LTD.
PACIFIC COAST RESTAURANTS, INC.
PORTLAND, OR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine E. Maxson
Catherine E. Maxson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 20, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |