Drawing for NATIONAL JURY PROJECT

USPTO serial 73699462

NATIONAL JURY PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1562701Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 1989
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with NATIONAL JURY PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean Ploen

Sean Ploen Ploen Law Firm, PC724 Bielenberg Drive, #19Saint Paul, MN 55125-2620UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042CONSULTING SERVICES FOR ATTORNEYS IN HOW TO CONDUCT PRETRIAL RESEARCH AND JURY SELECTION; CONDUCTING SURVEYS OF LOCAL RESIDENTS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING POSSIBLE PREDISPOSITION ON THE PART OF JURORS IN LEGAL CASES; PREPARING WITNESSES FOR TRIALACTIVENov 1, 1975

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 25, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 25, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 25, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 28, 2019NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 28, 201989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 2, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Apr 30, 2019PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Apr 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2019E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 19, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 5, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 3, 2009E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2009CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 19, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 1, 1996RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Dec 28, 1995PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Feb 24, 1995815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 24, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 1, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 4, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance