USPTO serial 73699510
PRIMETIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIMETIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DORIS MAROKO
DORIS MAROKO WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS, ET ALP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 7, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |