Drawing for NAUTILE EXPEDITION TITANIC 1987 NADIR OCEANIC - IFREMER - WESTGATE

USPTO serial 73699776

NAUTILE EXPEDITION TITANIC 1987 NADIR OCEANIC - IFREMER - WESTGATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAUTILE EXPEDITION TITANIC 1987 NADIR OCEANIC - IFREMER - WESTGATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN J. MCGLEW

JOHN J MCGLEW SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041SERVICES IN THE EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT FILEDSABANDONEDAug 19, 1987
042OCEANIC AND UNDERWATER SALVAGE AND EXPLORATION SERVICESABANDONEDAug 19, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 21, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 21, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 22, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance