USPTO serial 73699849
MAGNUM FORGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNUM FORGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CITY OF COMMERCE, CA
CITY OF COMMERCE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT R. THORNTON
ROBERT R THORNTON ZOBRIST & MCCULLOUGHNINTH FL515 S FIGUEROA STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY SCREWDRIVERS, BOLT CUTTERS, GEAR PULLERS, POCKET KNIVES, LOCKING PLIERS, SOCKET SETS AND WRENCHES | ABANDONED | Dec 9, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |