USPTO serial 73700144
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH L. HALPERN
RALPH L HALPERN JAECKLE, FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL800 NORSTAR BLDGBUFFALO, NY 14202-2292UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | NEWSLETTER CONCERNING PUBLIC RELATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |