USPTO serial 73700576
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE SHAY WALD
ATTN: NORMAN S BEIER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | LIGHT FIXTURES; NAMELY, ELECTRIC TABLE, WALL AND FLOOR LAMPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1977 |
| 016 | PAPER GOODS; NAMELY, BOOKS PERTAINING TO DECOR, CALENDARS, CATALOGS PERTAINING TO DECOR, KITCHEN LABELS, WRAPPING PAPER, PAPER SHIPPING BOXES AND PAPER BAGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1977 |
| 020 | FURNITURE; NAMELY, TABLES, CHAIRS, SOFAS, STORAGE CABINETS, WOODEN TISSUE BOXES, DRESSERS, MIRRORS, BEDS, MATTRESSES, SIDEBOARDS, KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS, HAT AND COAT RACKS, PLASTIC BATHROOM SHELVES, PLASTIC FRAMED MIRRORS, AND PLASTIC MEDICINE CABINETS; AND PILLOWS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1977 |
| 027 | WALLPAPER, BATH MATS, RUGS OF FABRICS AND FIBERS, AND FLOOR MATS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1977 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2000 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 24, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 18, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |