USPTO serial 73701151
MULTILOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTILOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH S. LITTENBERG
JOSEPH S LITTENBERG LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR ERECTING CONTAINER BLANKS AND MACHINES FOR SEALING AND CLOSING ERECTED CONTAINER BLANKS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | PACKAGES AND PACKAGING MATERIAL OF PAPER AND CARDBORAD, POUCHES OF PLASTICS FOR FOOD PRODUCTS AND PLASTICS MATERIAL IN THE FORM OF FILM, FOIL OR SHEETS, ALL FOR PACKAGING PURPOSES PLASTIC FOILS AND LAMINATES OF PLASTICS, ESPECIALLY FLEXIBLE FOILS | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | PLASTICS IN THE FORM OF NON-RIGID FILMS, FOILS AND SHEETS, BEING USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PACKAGING CONTAINERS AND NON-RIGID LAMINATES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |