USPTO serial 73701271
LB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1818666Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 1994
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
575 VILA NOVA DE GAIA, PT
5085 PINHAO, PT
575 VILA NOVA DE GAIA, PT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. PARKER LIVINGSTON, JR
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PORT WINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |