USPTO serial 73701369
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MIAMI, FL
MIAMI, FL
MIAMI, FL
MIAMI, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIE S. MALLOY
JENNIE S MALLOY ` MALLOY, DOWNEY & MALLOYONE BISCAYNE TWR - 37602 S BISCAYNE BLVDMIAMI, FL 33131| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPARED FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BEEF, PORK, POULTRY, RICE AND VEGETABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1988 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1988 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |