Drawing for TELE 3-2-1

USPTO serial 73701421

TELE 3-2-1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELE 3-2-1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM J. EGAN, III

WILLIAM J EGAN III FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ET ALSTE 3400FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS RECORDED ON MAGNETIC MEDIA FOR MAINTAINING A DIRECTORY OF RELEVANT INFORMATION, SUCH AS COMPANY NAMES, INDIVIDUAL NAMES, CONTACT DATES, AND PERTINENT INFORMATION CONCERNING SUCH NAMES AND DATESABANDONEDOct 21, 1987
016INTRODUCTORY MANUALS, USER MANUALS AND PRINTED INSTRUCTION GUIDES FOR OPERATION OF COMPUTER DATA BASED SYSTEMSABANDONEDOct 21, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 1989ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 30, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 5, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance