Drawing for BEHR SEALTITE

USPTO serial 73701888

BEHR SEALTITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, JERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEHR SEALTITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GORDON H. OLSON

GORDON H OLSON KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON AND BEARSTE 1600620 NEWPORT CTRNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001ALL-PURPOSE WATER PROOFING SEALER FOR WOOD, MASONRY, FABRIC AND OTHER POROUS SURFACESABANDONEDJan 22, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 1993OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 23, 1992ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 23, 1992OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 1990OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 26, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 1989ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 6, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance