USPTO serial 73701925
INET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KURZBARD, MYRA K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES L. BIKOFF
JAMES L BIKOFF BAKER & HOSTETLER1010 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |