USPTO serial 73702025
REVIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REVIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES V. CALLAHAN
JAMES V CALLAHAN ALLEGRETTI & WITCOFF, LTD30TH FL10 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | STIMULANT PILLS IN THE NATURE OF CAFFEINE CONTAINED WITHIN SOFTGELS | ABANDONED | Sep 8, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |