Drawing for THE CHRISTMAS CAROL VIDEO

USPTO serial 73702460

THE CHRISTMAS CAROL VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CHRISTMAS CAROL VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY A. SCHWAB

JEFFREY A SCHWAB ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SERIES OF PRE-RECORDED VIDIO-CASSETTES CONTAING HOLIDAY MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT SCENESABANDONEDJul 13, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 15, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance