USPTO serial 73702995
RIF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RIF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN T. BROWN
SUSAN T BROWN CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN1615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RADAR AERIAL AND SPACE VEHICLE GUIDANCE UNITS AND PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |