USPTO serial 73703027
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDITH A ZAKENS
JUDITH A ZAKENS FOX OFFICE CTRLITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES INC2211 WOODWARD AVEDETROIT, MI 48201-3400| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PIZZA FOR CONSUMPTION ON AND OFF THE PREMISES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 6, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |