Drawing for HARDILINER

USPTO serial 73703539

HARDILINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1568392Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 1989
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARDILINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Shereen Zamaludin

Lisa Shereen Zamaludin Slates Harwell, LLP1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 3800DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019INTERIOR CEMENT CEILING AND WALL LINER BOARDEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 31, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 17, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 10, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 7, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2000RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 15, 20009G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Oct 25, 19999.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Jun 19, 19968.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 27, 19958.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Nov 28, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1988UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance