USPTO serial 73703587
ORBITEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2146901Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 1998
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORBITEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DUNSTABLE, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
DUNSTABLE, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
LUTON, BEDFORSHIRE, GB
DUNSTABLE, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOAN L. DILLON
JOAN L DILLON KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONES, TELEPHONE EXCHANGES AND SWITCHBOARD APPARATUS, TELEPHONE MANAGEMENT INSTALLATIONS APPARATUS AND COMPONENT PARTS THEREFOR, TELEX AND FACSIMILE TELEGRAPH MACHINES AND REPLACEMENT PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF TELEPHONE MANAGEMENT INSTALLATIONS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING TRAINING AND/OR SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TELEPHONE SYSTEMS, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND THE USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE WITH TELEPHONE MANAGEMENT INSTALLATIONS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF TELEPHONE AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF TELEPHONE MANAGEMENT INSTALLATIONS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SR COMMS MANAGEMENT LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SR COMMS MANAGEMENT LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SYSTEMS RELIABILITY PLC
- Other trademarks owned by SR COMMS MANAGEMENT LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ORBITEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |