Drawing for KETTLE CREEK CANVAS CO.

USPTO serial 73703622

KETTLE CREEK CANVAS CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KETTLE CREEK CANVAS CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD A. FLYNT

RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING NAMELY, SWEATERS; SHIRTS; T-SHIRTS; SWEATSHIRTS; TOPS; PANTS; TROUSERS; JEANS; SHORTS; SKIRTS; DRESSES; JUMPERS; PLAYSUITS; OVERALLS; SLEEPWEAR; LINGERIE; SOCKS; VESTS; JACKETS; BELTS; BLAZERS; HATS; DUFFLE BAGS; PURSES; PENCIL CASES; ORGANIZERS CONSISTING OF A NUMBER OF POCKETS CONSTRUCTED OF CLOTH TO BE HUNG ON A WALL; BEER SLINGS; SHOPPING BAGS; WALLETS; LEATHER ACCESSORIES NAMELY, CHECKERS AND BACKGAMMON; NOVELTY ITEMS, STUFFED ANIMALS; ROBESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 25, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 23, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 21, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance