USPTO serial 73703824
HEALTHGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. VEAL
ROBERT J VEAL JENNINGS, CARTER, THOMPSON & VEALSTE 1150BANK FOR SAVINGS BLDGBIRMINGHAM, AL 35203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING COMPUTERIZED PRESCRIPTION AND MEDICATION EXPENSE SUMMARIES TO INDIVIDUAL RETAIL CUSTOMERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |