USPTO serial 73704227
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HIROSHIMA-KEN, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT G. MCMORROW, P.C.
ROBERT G MCMORROW, PC SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK AND SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC WOOD AND METAL WORKING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR; SMALL UNIVERSAL MACHINES FOR WOOD, METAL AND BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, SAWS, GROOVE CUTTERS, DRILLING MACHINES, DRILLS, SCREW DRIVERS, HAMMERS, PLANERS, SANDERS, GRINDERS, TRIMMERS, POLISHERS, ROUTERS, RESIN MIXERS, CHAIN MORTISERS, GAUGE SHEARS, AND HOME CARPENTER'S KITS COMPRISING ELECTRIC WOODWORKING MACHINES, AND THEIR PARTS; PNEUMATIC WORKING MACHINES AND SMALL PNEUMATIC UNIVERSAL MACHINES FOR WOOD, METAL AND BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, DRILLS, DISC SANDERS, GRINDERS, POLISHERS, NAIL DRIVING MACHINES, NUT RUNNERS, TAPPERS, HAMMERS, RAMMERS AND PARTS THEREFOR; INDUSTRIAL BLOWERS; ELECTRIC WELDING MACHINES; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; WINCHES; GASOLINE POWERED TOOLS, NAMELY, SAWS, GARDEN TRIMMERS, HAMMER DRILLS, CONCRETE HAMMERS, GRINDERS, CIRCULAR SAWS, BLADES AND TIP TOOLS FOR POWER TOOLS, SAW BLADES ROUTER BITS, SHAPER CUTTERS, DRILL BITS, GRINDING WHEELS, AND PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |