USPTO serial 73704361
PICK-UP-PUTTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PICK-UP-PUTTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THORNHILL, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER B. STOREY
ROGER B STOREYSCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WSTE 4000 BOX 401TORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, GOLF CLUBS AND GRIPS AND COVERS THEREFOR, GOLF BAGS, NON-MOTORIZED GOLF CARTS, GOLF BALLS AND TEES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |