USPTO serial 73704571
SCANDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCANDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. SHARON SCHILLER
DOUGLAS B MCKNIGHT CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | CUSTOM MADE KITCHEN CABINETS SOLD THROUGH LUMBER DEALERS, KITCHEN CABINET SUPPLY HOUSES AND KITCHEN REMODELERS | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |