Drawing for E-TEL

USPTO serial 73705263

E-TEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1648354Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 18, 1991
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-TEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. BRUCE PROUT

D BRUCE SPROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038COMMUNICATION SERVICES, [ INCLUDING ] * NAMELY, * ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION SERVICES, TELEGRAPH, [ TELEX ] * TELEPRINTER EXCHANGE SERVICES * , FACSIMILE * , * AND ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 1997C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 19, 1997CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 1996PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 7, 1991COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 26, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 31, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 19, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 25, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance