USPTO serial 73705467
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kia Kamran
Kia Kamran Kia Kamran, P.C.1900 Avenue of the Stars, 25th FlLos Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | PORCELAIN, CHINA AND EARTHENWARE DINNERWARE, NAMELY, DINNER PLATES, SALAD PLATES, SAUCERS, CUPS, CEREAL BOWLS AND SERVING DISHES, GLASS BEVERAGEWARE, CRYSTAL SERVEWARE, COOKWARE, NAMELY, SAUCE PANS, LIDS, DUTCH OVENS, SKILLETS AND TEA KETTLES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |