Drawing for Serial No. 73705614

USPTO serial 73705614

Serial No. 73705614

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73705614?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID H. JAFFER

DAVID H JAFFER ROSENBLUM, PARISH & BACIGALUPI160 W SANTA CLARA ST 15TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SAFETY HELMETS FOR BICYCLISTSABANDONEDMay 16, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 30, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 25, 1992CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 13, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 28, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 28, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 4, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 21, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance