USPTO serial 73705673
HEALTHCHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEALTHCHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
COMSOURCE INDEPENDENT FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by COMSOURCE INDEPENDENT FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN M. DORVEE
STEPHEN M DORVEE ARNALL GOLDEN & GREGORY55 PARK PL STE 400ATLANTA, GA 30335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHEESE, JELLY, JAM, SALAD DRESSING, SOUP, PEANUT BUTTER, MAYONNAISE, AND PROCESSED FRUIT TOPPINGS AND FILLINGS FOR USE ON DESSERTS AND IN BAKING | ABANDONED | Jul 6, 1987 |
| 030 | PANCAKE AND WAFFLE SYRUP, FLAVORED AND SWEETENED GELATINS, PUDDINGS, SEASONINGS, SPICES, SPAGHETTI SAUCE, MUFFINS, CAKE AND COOKIES | ABANDONED | Jul 6, 1987 |
| 032 | SODA WATER, FRUIT JUICE AND SUGAR FREE SOFT DRINKS | ABANDONED | Jul 6, 1987 |
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SALES AND MARKETING OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND FOOD SUPPLIERS | ABANDONED | Jul 6, 1987 |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE SELECTION OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND SUPPLIERS | ABANDONED | Jul 6, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMSOURCE INDEPENDENT FOODSERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HEALTHCHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |