USPTO serial 73706258
FLEX TRIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEX TRIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. MICKEY HUBBARD
E MICKEY HUBBARD HUBBARD, THURMAN, TURNER AND TUCKER2100 ONE GALLERIA TWRDALLAS, TX 75240-6604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | PLASTIC ARCHITECTURAL TRIM MOLDING COMPONENTS FOR ASSEMBLY AS INTERIOR TRIM IN BUILDINGS | ABANDONED | Sep 6, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |