USPTO serial 73708038
CELLECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS E. CIOTTI
THOMAS E CIOTTI IRELL & MANELLA545 MIDDLEFIELD RDSTE 200MENLO PARK, CA 94025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | CELL SEPARATION DEVICE FOR MEDICAL USE FOR PREFERENTIALLY OR SPECIFICALLY REMOVING OR IDENTIFYING CELLS FROM A PHYSIOLOGICAL FLUID SUCH AS PLASMA FOR USE IN MEDICAL TREATMENTS SUCH AS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTS | ABANDONED | Nov 16, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 20, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |