USPTO serial 73708304
PENETRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PENETRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HAWTHORN, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD D. JEFFERY
DONALD D JEFFERY SCHWARTZ, JEFFERY SCHWAAB, MACK, ET ALP O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE, NAMELY BATH SOAP, ANTIPERSPIRANT SOAP, DEODORANT SOAP, DISINFECTANT SOAP; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE; TOILET PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, HAND SOAP, FACIAL CLEANSER, TOILET POWDER, TOILET CREAM, TOILET OILS AND TOILET PASTE; PERFUMERY, NAMELY, EAU DE COLOGNE, EAU DE TOILETTE, EAU DE PARFUM, TALCUM POWDER; PREPARATIONS FOR APPLICATION TO THE SKIN TO FACILITATE SHAVING, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS AND PREPARATIONS, SHAVING BALM, SHAVING SOAP AND PASTE; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY HAIR OIL, HAIR LOTION, HAIR WASHES AND HAIR TONICS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |