USPTO serial 73708361
LANDMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANDMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWIN KOMEN
EDWIN KOMEN BRYLAWSKI, CLEARY & LEEDS801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S EWASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND INTEGRATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR THE CAPTURE, STORAGE, DISPLAY, PROCESSING AND ONGOING MANAGEMENT OF GEOGRAPHICALLY-REFERENCED INFORMATION AND THE PRODUCTION OF MAPS, REPORTS AND OTHER OUTPUT RELATED THERETO | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND INTEGRATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR THE CAPTURE, STORAGE, DISPLAY, PROCESSING AND ONGOING MANAGEMENT OF GEOGRAPHICALLY-REFERENCED INFORMATION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |