USPTO serial 73709450
GOLD EDITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLD EDITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEYER A. GROSS
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN & GROSS230 PARK AVE STE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC SPIRITS, NAMELY WHISKEY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |